October 3, 2012  ·  Lessig  · Reblogged from  Tumblr

I’m excited and honored (and happy I get to bring my family) to be participating in Vermont’s first “Amendment Weekend.” Here’s the program. Click on the RSVP at the bottom if you want to participate. 

Amendment Weekend w/ Lawrence Lessig & Bill McKibben
October 13 &14 —— THREE EVENTS FOR YOU!

We enthusiastically invite you to hear
LAWRENCE LESSIG and BILL MCKIBBEN:

In a few weeks Lawrence Lessig will be in Vermont. 

He wants to meet with us to discuss where we should all be going together next in our Amendment Effort.

Last July, Senator Leahy held Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings on a Constitutional Amendment to rescind the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. Professor Lessig was one of the star witnesses.  Larry is the author of Republic Lost- How Money Corrupts Congress and a Plan to Stop it. His lectures are available on the web, as is a fun interview he did w/ Jon Stewart on the Daily Show. 

 You all know Bill McKibben, who continues to fight to change the course of climate change devastation.  Bill will preview his Climate Change Musical Road Show. You are invited!

Special Interest Money is destroying democracy and the environment.

Citizens United is one example among many of how this is happening. 

Linking the Amendment and Environmental Movements will be a defining theme for the weekend.

OCT 13 – Saturday-

Lawrence Lessig & Bill McKibben

EVENT I: Professor Lessig
WHEN:  5 o’clock Saturday afternoon.
WHERE: University of Vermont. Lafayette Hall (next to Royall Tyler Theater). Room 108. Please get there at 4:45. Parking is available off Colchester Ave behind Ira Allen Chapel.

Larry’s message is, in part, that the threat to our Democracy and the need for a Constitutional Amendment goes well beyond Citizens United. What better subject when our election and lawmaking process seems to be controlled by special interest money. 

After Larry’s talk we will break for some conversation, some food, & Ben & Jerry’s ice cream. Please RSVP.


EVENT II: Bill Mckibben
WHEN: 7 PM Saturday evening

At 6:45 we will walk next door to Ira Allen Chapel for a dress rehearsal of Bill Mckibben’s new musical road show. Please RSVP if you want to attend. Seats will be reserved for you.

OCTOBER 14 — Sunday-

EVENT III – Amendment BBQ w/ Lawrence Lessig

WHEN:  Sunday 4:30- 6:30+/-

Bring a dish, bring yourself, and share a unique opportunity to talk with Lawrence Lessig.  Have a conversation with Larry over dinner.  Amendment activists from around Vermont will be there. This is an organized potluck. We will provide the main course and drinks.

Please RSVP and let us know what you will contribute to the potluck—side dishes and desserts.

WHERE: Bill Butler/ Susan Harritt homestead

               23 Bentley Lane, Jericho VT

    Folks are welcome to stay longer, if the conversation continues.

Accommodations are available for those traveling from a distance.

All offers of help will be appreciated. 

See you Oct. 13/14!

Bill Butler, Susan Harritt, Senator Ginny Lyons

RSVP 

  • http://www.blackmask.com David Moynihan

    I guess to give a little more background on how reliable the news was (and it may not have any bearing on the recent election results!) perhaps the most tragic element of post-Korean war history for the ROK was the Kwangju incident in 1980, where miltary troops armed with weapons from bayonets to (some say) gunships put down labor protests in South Cholla province (big part of Kim Dae Jung’s power base).

    A lot of protesters died. Official body count was around 200, but the people never believed it. Press at the time I was there (95-96) would sometimes reference various protests (which were ongoing), by calling South Cholla province “the economically backward region” and worse… with the greatest sin being not to have GDP per capita of $10,000.

  • Karl

    This story on Slashdot implies that it was text messaging that won the day, but that webpresence was also a huge reason for the outcome of the election. The discussion is about this Globe and Mail story.

    I don’t want to oversimplify things, but it seems that young people just needed a reminder to vote. I don’t see any particular mention of blogs.

    -kd

  • Sangmin Shim

    As a person who was in Korea at the time of the presidential election, I feel that some more facts might be helpful to things in perspective.

    First of all, it turned out after the election that most polls had predicted Mr. Moo-Hyun Roh’s victory by a margin of 1.5-2% over the other presidential candidate, Mr. Hoe-Chang Lee. (one funny thing about the Korean presidential election law is that, while people are free to run polls as they like it, they are forbidden to announce the results when they are done within the last two weeks before the election day.) There was an unexpected event the night before the election day, however, which was that a politician named Mong Joon Chung, who had quit the presidential race in support of Mr. Roh, announced his withdrawl of support for Mr. Roh for apparently personal reasons. This sent the sense of frustration and disillusionment throughout the nation, and many people chose not to bother to vote on the election day. Here the technology wielded its strengths in a dramatic fashion: Learning by exit polls that Mr. Roh was trailing the other candidate in the morning hours, Mr. Roh’s campaigners and supporters started sending out text messages and posting blogs, urging young people to vote. The turnout significantly increased from early afternoon, mostly by youngsters, and around 3 pm of the day Mr. Roh came ahead of Mr. Lee and went on to win the election.

    As for the effects of internet and technology on the presidential election in Korea, my sense is that they were quite effective in bringing together the support for Mr. Roh and in depicting him as a “new leader in a new age” who basked in the blessings of new technology. For those who desparately longed for various changes in the status quo in Korea, this made-up (indeed it is) image was received as good news in the biblical sense, and was a powerful symbol that led him to the victory.

    Sangmin Shim, JSD candidate, SLS

  • Somee

    During the recent presidential election in Korea, supporters for the winning candidate, President Roh, used the Internet as an effective campaign tool. Many people credit this grassroots online effort with President Roh�s surprising electoral victory.

    The Internet created a number of new opportunities in Korea:
    (i) New forms of political organization which do not require formal structures like those of previous political organizations, and which, as a result, can be created quickly and without a lot of money. The grassroots organization that played a key role in President�s Roh�s victory, which calls itself �People Who Love Roh Moo Hyun�, was born in cyberspace during the election campaign (www.nosamo.org);
    (ii) Alternative news sources: Popular independent news sources, including “Oh, My News” (www.ohmynews.com) or “Pressian” offered a voice that�s different from Korea�s leading newspapers (which tend to be quite conservative);
    (iii) Civic organizations have started using the Internet to mobilize people. NGOs and civic groups use the Internet to raise money, post their agendas, or spread their opinions using message boards (message boards are very popular in Korea). See http://peoplepower21.org.

    The Internet proved to be a very effective and efficient method to both understand public opinion, and to help shape it. The wide availability of broadband (more than 50% of households have DSL, Ran or VDSL), is one of the reasons for this.

    One key factor in the last presidential elections in Korea was the generation gap that played out: President Roh won the election thanks to the support of young people. The older generation by and large voted for his conservative opponent.
    The main supporters of candidate Roh were relatively young people in their 20′s or 30′s. This could be because the younger generation is more liberal then older generations. But in the case of the Korean presidential election, the younger generation who elected the reformist president was also the wired generation that was familiar with the Internet in their daily life and tapped into the new resources discussed above.

    In sum, the recent Korean presidential election, and the impact of online communications on the election�s outcome, raises a number of interesting issues. A younger, wired generation took over the reigns from their parents� generation to install a reformist government, replacing the traditional left v. right paradigm with a generational gap. Equity issues also appeared: people who couldn�t access the Internet did not have access to the entire picture, and were in a sense excluded from a critical part of the political process that turned out to be decisive (Internet-based campaigning and online information sources).