Comments on: SciAm on CC http://www.lessig.org/2005/01/sciam-on-cc/ Blog, news, books Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:56:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.2 By: Melanie http://www.lessig.org/2005/01/sciam-on-cc/#comment-21214 Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:22:02 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2005/01/sciam_on_cc.html#comment-21214 I remember when Sci Am was worthwhile, intriguing reading. It’s a shame that it went left and abandoned real science. *a moment of silence*
-Mel
http://beads.psonizo.com

]]>
By: Orion http://www.lessig.org/2005/01/sciam-on-cc/#comment-21213 Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:02:09 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2005/01/sciam_on_cc.html#comment-21213 First – well done for trying to fight spam bots. I have now pretty much denied posting to all but registered users because of the trouble I have had with them at orionrobots.

Anyway – it is fantastic that SA endorses CC. Being from the UK, I dont get SA, but I do read News Scientist and Wired.

Most of my content on orionrobots is creative commons licensed. It is a great way to try and encourage more innovation and creation in a world were it is so rapidly being stifled by red tape.

]]>
By: Alex http://www.lessig.org/2005/01/sciam-on-cc/#comment-21212 Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:14:31 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2005/01/sciam_on_cc.html#comment-21212 SciAm is a joke now. It went downmarket, tried to turn itself into a kind of lefty “Discover,” hired some glitzy graphic artists and dumbed-down its articles.

If you can bear to read the magazine now after remembering what it was like, and can wade through the lefty propaganda to find the occasional unbiased article, you understand what’s happened to it.

It’s been Creative Commoned!

]]>
By: Jardinero1 http://www.lessig.org/2005/01/sciam-on-cc/#comment-21211 Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:09:52 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2005/01/sciam_on_cc.html#comment-21211 I started reading “Scientific American” back in the seventies when I was about ten. I stopped reading back in the nineties when it stopped being “Scientific” and “American”. It should be more aptly named “Tabloid of International Opinion on Science Issues, Occasionally”. I still read “Science News”(since I was seven), a publication which has stayed true to its roots.

I understand that publications have to update their formats from time to time to maintain advertisers but what happened at Scientific American is tantamount to converting your local public library into a dirty bookstore.

]]>
By: Harry http://www.lessig.org/2005/01/sciam-on-cc/#comment-21210 Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:24:26 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2005/01/sciam_on_cc.html#comment-21210 When I read that a few days back I was thinking of writing a letter to the editor. It was going challenge or ask, or (waiting for the coffee too hit this am) something. Pretty much asking if they would be willing to change to a CC system. But then I was thinking that it would be too arrogant or confrontational. But then my cat ran across the room and I found myself making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

But the meat of the question remains, will a major magazine/publication adopt CC?

]]>